alexh wrote:For example someone found the schematics of the Atari ST Chipset.
Sorgelig wrote:If you don't need verilog but just decapping, then you have more luck.
Sorgelig wrote:High resolution shots of 68000 and some Amiga chips are floating on internet.
Sorgelig wrote:There are many better implementations of said chips in verilog,
Sorgelig wrote:but authors usually don't want to make them opensource.
Sorgelig wrote: I envy your optimism on open source. I'm more pessimistic since i'm in this area some time already.
alexh wrote:The problem associated with decapping old chips and turning them into verilog is that they used lots of "nasty" tricks which cannot be directly implemented in an FPGA today. The circuits have to be interpreted and somewhat re-designed. It is essential that the decapping take place but it is not a 1:1 copy what is there process.
Locutus73 wrote:... and a solid, trustable, fund raising platform.
ijor wrote:Forgot to comment about that. I am not fan of the fund raising of these kind of projects. The decapping cost is affordable (I paid a a couple from my own pocket), and some people have the equipment to do it for free.
ijor wrote: Then of course that it takes an amazing amount of time to do the actual reverse engineering. But that's "just time".
ijor wrote: And even when time costs a lot of money, I don't like to be paid for my time for these kind of hobby projects. Neither I like to pay others. Paying people to do what we can do with time is kinda corrupting and tainting these projects, IMHO.
Locutus73 wrote:It was my understanding that decapping was very expensive and required non domestic high-specialized equipment. I mean, software development, even the most qualified and refined, can be done at home and good developers are not a rare resource in the retro community (mostly nerd and geeks like us ). I believed that decapping skilled people with access to the needed equipment was rarer and that decapping skilled people loving retrocomputing/gaming and with access to the needed equipment maybe was extremely esoteric. But I might be wrong.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests