Moderators: Mug UK, Zorro 2, Greenious, spiny, Moderator Team
Frank B wrote:The stand alone version is more interesting than the CPU card version. This is depending on how good the SAGA emulation of AGA is and what extra features it adds. No Atari support however as expected. No MMU or FPU either?
OL wrote:Frank B wrote:The stand alone version is more interesting than the CPU card version. This is depending on how good the SAGA emulation of AGA is and what extra features it adds. No Atari support however as expected. No MMU or FPU either?
Appolo core support an MMU but not compatible with other 68K CPU, Appolo core support FPU but up to now there was not enough memory on Vampire V2 card, so I suppose it will be available on the V4.
We can work to have good support of SAGA in Emutos
Frank B wrote:OL wrote:Frank B wrote:The stand alone version is more interesting than the CPU card version. This is depending on how good the SAGA emulation of AGA is and what extra features it adds. No Atari support however as expected. No MMU or FPU either?
Appolo core support an MMU but not compatible with other 68K CPU, Appolo core support FPU but up to now there was not enough memory on Vampire V2 card, so I suppose it will be available on the V4.
We can work to have good support of SAGA in Emutos
It should really just mimic the 040 MMU or the 030 one. A custom one means retrofitting support to it for mint etc.
OL wrote:Frank B wrote:OL wrote:
Appolo core support an MMU but not compatible with other 68K CPU, Appolo core support FPU but up to now there was not enough memory on Vampire V2 card, so I suppose it will be available on the V4.
We can work to have good support of SAGA in Emutos
It should really just mimic the 040 MMU or the 030 one. A custom one means retrofitting support to it for mint etc.
In all case if we want take advantage of 68080 Mint need to be updated (more register to save, MMU ...) but Mint can work as it is and already run under 68080. Who use protected mode? near nobody, perhaps some developpers as I do to remove bugs
Frank B wrote:OL wrote:Frank B wrote:
It should really just mimic the 040 MMU or the 030 one. A custom one means retrofitting support to it for mint etc.
In all case if we want take advantage of 68080 Mint need to be updated (more register to save, MMU ...) but Mint can work as it is and already run under 68080. Who use protected mode? near nobody, perhaps some developpers as I do to remove bugs
I'd rather have memory protection in Mint if at all possible. I can't remember if Magic supports memory protection. If it does then a compatible MMU would be nice.
OL wrote:Frank B wrote:OL wrote:
In all case if we want take advantage of 68080 Mint need to be updated (more register to save, MMU ...) but Mint can work as it is and already run under 68080. Who use protected mode? near nobody, perhaps some developpers as I do to remove bugs
I'd rather have memory protection in Mint if at all possible. I can't remember if Magic supports memory protection. If it does then a compatible MMU would be nice.
No Magic has no memory protection
You use Mint in protected mode? For me system crash more than without! I not see really useful of it in Atari world a lot of software are absolutely not compatible with this
OL wrote:You use Mint in protected mode? For me system crash more than without! I not see really useful of it in Atari world a lot of software are absolutely not compatible with this
vido wrote:I find memory protection very useful. I had very stable system with it enabled on my Milan060. It is shame it is not available for the FireBee.
When you find what software make troubles with MP enabled you just dont use it anyway. I had no need to use such software at all.
Atarieterno wrote:...but how many "Vampire" to 300 or 400 € could be sold? That would be an exclusive product with inflated price...
PeterS wrote:I've never used MP on the Milan. I tried it but Thing desktop didn't work so I switched MP off again.
PeterS wrote:Mint on the Milan is very stable even without it and few apps crash. The ones that do crash would probably crash in MP as well.
PeterS wrote:I would consider a very fast FPGA "CPU" upgrade for the Milan, at the right price.
1st1 wrote:I think all of you should talk less about them but more with them.
Cyprian wrote:1st1 wrote:I think all of you should talk less about them but more with them.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest